![]() Click here for more companies that support Dragbike.com! |
Plasma Ignition |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 34567 8> |
| Author | ||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 November 2009 at 8:34am |
|
|
Very good! At least we are starting to see the same things. Do me a favor, keep this same setup with the NGK plug, boot not used, just like you show in this last picture. Now, take and hook up that braid for the Nology wire and lets see if this changes things. It may take some time, to see any change.
Thanks for the side view. It does look like the grooves are deeper on the Nology than the NGK. Maybe this is the week point. Did you run the numbers with air to see what 500 PSI would be for a gap? I bet for air the Paschen Curve is well known. This would at least give you an idea of what sort of interconnection you will need. I don't know about modern high power coax but have a friend who worked on the radar systems for the miliitary back in the day. They would fill the coax with nitrogen gas for this reason. What I could do is try using some dope on the interconnect rather than the GE stuff. The problem with the dope is it takes a long time to dry and is hard once it sets. |
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 November 2009 at 3:01pm |
|
I did it several times and there wasn't much difference. Then I did put boot back. Breakdown started at 200 psi. Then I did put quite lot of silicon grease between boot and plug ground. That did help at least until 250 psi. |
||
![]() |
||
Roland Tamaccio
Senior Member
Joined: 20 November 2003 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1852 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 November 2009 at 4:32pm |
|
|
... Sam, it's silicone, not silicon. Btw, I am looking for some silicone oil, or silicone based oil, similar to what is used in harmonic dampeners. Anyone, anyone ???
|
||
|
... All the Federalees say,
... We could have had him, any day, ... But who would haul our aerospace freight, away. |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 November 2009 at 6:39pm |
|
I assume this was all with the NGK plug and to be clear then, the grease got you to where you were without the boot. This is very similar results to mine.
|
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 3:01am |
|
Yes, typo Grease was this one http://eng.smazka.ru/services/prod/sport/, but I suppose that silicon grease would do same thing. I don't know it's insulation properties. |
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 5:42am |
|
Resistor NGK-plug. It started to breakdown at 200 psi without boot, but not at every 500 spark sequence (I could set the number of pulses). Then I did connect the boot and breakdown glow was there all the time betwwn boot and plug ground. With grease I did went to 250 psi and it didn't breakdown. I did rotate it and I didn't see anything. At the beginning I did have to fix and increase grease-isulation couple of times. It seems that grease will help but it is difficult install grease without air bubbles and tightly to plug insulation. Probably silicone glue would be better. ![]() Edited by shmot - 06 November 2009 at 5:43am |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 7:48am |
|
|
I figured some of the strange spelling and terms are just the difference in country. It's not a big deal. I understand your posts.
Now that's using the grease! ![]() Maybe you could mold your own boots? Is the boots your using long enough that the connector could be placed deeper inside so the boot would extend to the base of the plug? Or, snip off some silicone tube and slide it over the plug before putting the boot on? It's funny how your trying to prevent breakdown at very high pressures. Some of the things I have worked on, we try to prevent it at very low pressures. Material choices become a huge concern. |
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
Roland Tamaccio
Senior Member
Joined: 20 November 2003 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1852 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 8:44am |
|
|
... Well, now you need some custom made plugs with tall insulators, with more ribs.
Edited by Roland Tamaccio - 06 November 2009 at 8:45am |
||
|
... All the Federalees say,
... We could have had him, any day, ... But who would haul our aerospace freight, away. |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 9:52am |
|
|
Boots would be cheaper to prototype than plugs.
I think the real question is do you really need to run up this high? Where is the 500 PSI coming from?
If nitro really does require the the hostest ignitions known to man, it would be interesting to know what they are using for wires, boots, plugs and gap settings. The fuel would play into the breakdown but just to see a relative difference with the air and nitrogen gas would be interesting.
|
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 10:07am |
|
Probably my spelling is much better after all of these problems are solved This is nice way to parctise it. Sorry of that...
I think problem is small airgap between plug insulation and boot. Breakdown voltage for air is 4.7 kV/ 1mm (0.039") and for insulation materials >20 kV/ 1mm (0.039"). Probably airgap is so small that there isn't "room" for large current flow (look at the arc with or without boot). Distance from plug tip to bottom is 1" but air breakdown voltage to 0.039" doesn't stay constant if distance or pressure are increased. What I did found out from one handbook that for 1" airgap breakdown voltage is 68 kV. That can't be true or coil output voltage is much higher than 100 x coil primary voltage 520 V. One possibility is to glue boots to plugs to prevent airgap or build some barrell over plug insulation and boot and fill it with mineral oil. Edited by shmot - 06 November 2009 at 10:09am |
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 10:23am |
|
With nitro they have low compression and large ignition advance. They don't need so much voltage. With 3 bar of boost, 30 deg ignition advance and 1:11 compression ratio pressure should be around 500 psi when ignition starts. |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 11:13am |
|
|
My spelling is very poor. As a child, I would always be the first out of the spelling B (quiz). It could be some sort of learing disability or I am lazy, don't know, don't care. If you post something I don't understand, I will ask. So, forget about it. Your doing fine and its a great topic!!
I really know nothing about the nitro stuff but I do think your right about the large advance. That fuel seems to burn very slow and I assume this is why you see them blowing the flames out the exhaust. Would be interesting to know a little more about this but let's assume your right and their ignition requirments are minimal.
Let's say your right about the 500 psi for now. For the same pressure, how will the fuel mixture your using effect breakdown versus the air your testing with? I would guess just the day to day weather changes will effect your test using the air. It seems like you will need to somehow figure this out before you can really decide what you need to handle for the breakdown.
Now, can you show me how your coming up with the 500 psi? Show your math.
|
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 12:38pm |
|
Now I get 650 psi for 45 psi boost I did use this http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/compression/cranking_pressure.shtml to calculate compression pressure for no boost and multiplied that with absolute pressure (bar) and cam duration set to zero (100 % volumetric efficiency). Compression ratio at time of spark 30 deg before TDC is around 1:7. Absolute pressure 4 bar (3 bar boost). Chamber pressure without boost 164 psi and with boost 164 psi x 4 = 656 psi. http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm That MEGA-manual calculator gives 48 kV for 0.043" cap, 400 kPa, 7 comp ratio and 40 C intake temp. I did probably take that 500 psi from these measurements http://www.tfxengine.com/SuperchargedEngineData.html They have also naturally aspirated nitro-engine pressure values. If ignition advance is 50 deg then pressure is less than 100 psi. http://www.tfxengine.com/NitroEngineData.html Edited by shmot - 06 November 2009 at 12:53pm |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 November 2009 at 1:18pm |
|
|
You also look at it as a gain problem. I am not sure this is right. I pulled a few text books but nothing really dove into the details.
Looking at the TFX plots, it's hard to say where the ignition took place. Maybe this is a blown nitro motor. Maybe they are showing it as the -40 BTDC start point. |
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2009 at 12:09pm |
|
|
There are some mistakes in megamanual "temperature after compression" -equation http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm. I did look page source calculator formulas and equation should be: The temperature after compression (before combustion) is:
where:
The pressure after compression is:
where:
Edited by shmot - 07 November 2009 at 12:13pm |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2009 at 12:58pm |
|
|
Do you people in Finland rake your leaves? What a mess this time of year.
![]() The equations look right but I wonder if this holds true for a two stage pump, i.e. turbo charged? |
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 November 2009 at 5:08am |
|
Not anymore. Now we have wet snow. http://www.shmotorsport.fi/kuvat/fall.jpg
I think that will only be different pressure and temp of air at the beginning of compression. Air temp will rise as in equations. I did read from one handbook that temp during ignition is 400 - 600 C (750-1100 F). Equations are giving 400 C for 1:7 compression ratio during ignition (1:11 compression ratio). That will make sense. By using these equations 300 psi and 68 F temp test conditions breakdown voltage is same as with 560 psi and 750 F temp. That would be 23 psi boost pressure. Methanol and nitro have their effect to "gamma" value and temp increase. If fuel is at liquid form (below 65 C with meth and 105 C with nitro) it will have to be first vaporized and energy needed for that is large (meth 301 kJ/kg and nitro 560 kJ/kg). Decreased temp will cause increased breakdown voltage. With gasoline amount of fuel is so low that it doesn't effect so much and gas is easy to vaporize. Edited by shmot - 08 November 2009 at 5:16am |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 November 2009 at 12:06pm |
|
|
Dang, snow already.
I consider my bike a rolling test lab. Smile
Let's start by checking some of what you presented against my bike. Let's assume I am using some typical air fuel ratio and use 1.4. I do use gasoline. Looking at my last recorded pass: Ambient Temp: 52 F = 284 K Intake Pressure: 101.4 KPa There really is no steady state condition as the bike makes it's way down the track. So I will use the final temperature and pressures. Outlet Temperature: 284 F = 413 K Outlet Pressure: 287.5 KPa 413 K / 284 K = 1.45 287.5 KPa / 101.4 KPa = 2.835 1-1.4^-1 = 0.2857 2.835^0.2857 = 1.347 So, about a 7% error. Not too bad considering we do not really know what gamma is. At least for the first stage (the turbocharger) the numbers hold true. We don't really know the source of the error, so let's not adjust anything (i.e. back calc a new gamma). The bike will make about 180 PSIG of cranking pressure with the current setup. The when the bike is down track, the ignition is set to 28 deg BTDC. If we assume this is a linear relashionship and the pressure is 0 at BDC. It's about 1 deg / PSIG so maybe 150 PSIG. Now comes the million dollar question, from this how can we determine the pressure once the boost is applied? We really don't know what the temperature rose to at the point of ignition. We can use your handbook numbers but I am not sure that makes sense. We know the the first stage has already added energy to the charge. |
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1856 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 November 2009 at 2:22pm |
|
|
If we keep gamma the same and use the peak cranking pressure to calculate the new pressure:
So cranking pressure was 180 PSIG = 1337 KPa @ 26.6C So looking at just the engine with this same gamma: (101.4 KPa / 1337 KPa )^(0.2857) = 0.4786 Now using the boost from my previous post: 413 K @ 287.5 KPa Then back calculate the new peak pressure: (287.5 KPa / Peak_Pres_Final)^(0.2857) = 0.4786 Peak_pres_Final = 3791 KPa Take off the 15% for 28 BTDC or about 3222 KPa or 453 PSIG Again, this is why I keep asking about how pumps behave in series. I don't know. My little 2 - pump series tests for sure did not fall any where near what I saw posted on the internet that the add. We need a turbo guru!!! |
||
|
As I proof my post, my finger on the send key, I pause, read it once more, then press. Mark
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Groupie
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 83 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 November 2009 at 2:13am |
|
|
At first stage compressor efficiency will effect to temperature rise
http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/glossary/turbo_glossary.shtml#compressor_efficiency. (PR^0.283 - 1) * Tambient Nice calculator for that http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/glossary/turbo_calc.shtml With your values Trise= 413 K - 284 K = 140 K ((287.5/101.4)^0.283 - 1) * 284 K Edited by shmot - 09 November 2009 at 3:06am |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 34567 8> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |