![]() Click here for more companies that support Dragbike.com! |
Plasma Ignition |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 10> |
| Author | ||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Plasma IgnitionPosted: 12 October 2009 at 6:47am |
|
|
We are working with plasma ignition for turbo-methanol bike. It will give 50-60 us duration spark and average 40 A current to spark plug. Basically it is small CDI-box controlled tig-welder. Spark duration is 3-4 crankshaft degrees at 12000 rpm. If spark duration is 1-2 ms as with magnetos spark duration is 72-144 degrees at 12000 rpm. One thing what I don't uderstand is why nitro-engines need so long duration (and small current) spark to ignite? What is the advance of long duration spark? If ignition point will vary a lot it has an effect to the power. Theoretically short duration and high power (current at spark plug cap) spark is better.
Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSoA2RKUv9U 190 mJ MSD + Nology Hotwires ![]() 190 mJ MSD + Nology Hotwires +plasma with 20 uF capasitor: ![]() Edited by shmot - 12 October 2009 at 7:25am |
||
![]() |
||
Roland Tamaccio
Senior Member
Joined: 20 November 2003 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1965 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:20pm |
|
|
... Figuring current in joules is somewhat misleading because of multiple sparks. The main problem with nitro is a hole going out. The "44" seems to be best at not having this happen. Most of the joule school guys like to argue this, but I would probably wait til proven wrong. Btw, good luck. PS, I have my doubts that what you have is true plasma.
Btw-II, on alky, the 44 does not seem to be as critical.
Edited by Roland Tamaccio - 12 October 2009 at 1:22pm |
||
|
... All the Federalees say,
... We could have had him, any day, ... But who would haul our aerospace freight, away. |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 October 2009 at 8:21pm |
|
|
Does not look like 12,000 RPM to me. Must be metric RPM. Looks more like MSD running multi-spark versus single spark at very low RPM. I don't understand the reference to plasma.
Post some more details. |
||
![]() |
||
funny1
Senior Member
Joined: 19 November 2003 Location: Herrin,Illinois Online Status: Offline Posts: 1327 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 October 2009 at 8:41pm |
|
|
looks too high tech to me I would just grab hold of them and see which one shocked me the most---the fastest |
||
|
Quit asking me questions that make me remember how long ago that was!
|
||
![]() |
||
Wade Clark
Admin Group
Big Daddy! Joined: 18 November 2003 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 6963 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 October 2009 at 9:16pm |
|
|
||
|
My signature was the same as Fasthouse's signature but then he changed it to some hoodoo voodoo stuff!
|
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 October 2009 at 9:46pm |
|
|
Here is an old patent for a plasma ignition. It is an interesting idea.
zoom=4#v=onepage&q=&f=false">http://www.google.com/patents?id=Vh0wAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract& zoom=4#v=onepage&q=&f=false Keep in mind, it's not just the ignition but the whole system. Picture showing one of the plasma plugs we used. There are 4 holes for the injection. Rubber end is just a protective cover. |
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 October 2009 at 4:29am |
|
|
Similar system:
http://www.aquapulser.com/plasma/radiant_plasma_spark/plasma_products.html I don't know if that is plasma or what is it, but 10 - 50 kV is needed to create spark and with our measurements it needs 40 V between spark plug cap (0.043") to keep spark alive at 40 A of current. With 0.32" cap it was 65 V. Idea is that usual high voltage CDI-ignition will create spark and after arc-threshold voltage is dropped low voltage (320 V DC) system will supply most of the current to spark plug cap. In this system 12V to 320V DC-DC power supply will charge 10 uF capasitor (could be around 5 - 60 uF depending of system) and charged energy will be discharged to spark plug through 3-5 ohm resistor and series of 15 kV diodes. Igbt-transistor will control capasitor and igbt is controlled by using cdi-box coil signal. That video is just first test with low frequency done by hand. We did test it at around 5000 rpm frequency by using frequency-generator. Next thing is to do pressure test like Mr Geek has been doing and study how pressure would effect to threshold voltage. I don't know if this ever going to work in practice, but theoretically it is better way to feed energy to spark plug. As with tig-welder high voltage is used to create arc and low voltage is used to control current. In our system current 12 V consumption from battery will be around 40 A for 8 plugs at 12000 rpm (50 us spark, 46 A average current and sequential ignition). Edited by shmot - 15 October 2009 at 5:58am |
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 October 2009 at 8:52am |
|
Nice paper, thanks! Our prototype is close to what they call "prior-art plasma" except we have transistor-control in the plasma ignition. Plasma voltage is only connected to plugs when there is a spark. That will reduce possibility of unwanted discharge. We could also build own plasma-control-system for each cylinder. We will probably use semi-surface discharge plugs R0045J (type E in catalog) http://www.ngksparkplugs.com/docs/racing_catalog.pdf http://www.ngk.com/results_cross.asp?pid=R0045J-11&x=60&y=7 Edited by shmot - 13 October 2009 at 9:01am |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 October 2009 at 11:41am |
|
|
The plug your calling out is sealed, so your plan is not to inject a gas that you will ionize to get plasma. You can see from the patent and the picture of the plug how this is done. |
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 October 2009 at 1:07pm |
|
Yes, I don't inject gas. It is just "ignition booster". I do understand word plasma as ionized gas when gas will come electrically conductive. Maybe using word plasma is wrong in this case because in every spark there is small plasma. This "ignition booster" will use property of ionized gas or plasma that it will come electrically conductive. Plasma torch is probably "true plasma". Edited by shmot - 13 October 2009 at 1:09pm |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 October 2009 at 10:25pm |
|
|
Hey, you removed your detailed post. I was going to read it tonight.
I think we are clear on what your trying to do now. It's been a while since I looked at the actual waveforms. Using the stock MC-4/blaster/wires, etc. what do you measure for the voltage across the plus and current? Any way for you to post them? |
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 October 2009 at 2:58am |
|
It is there? Post "Yesterday at 4:29am"
We did measurements with my frieds old oscilloscope and I didn't take photos from screen. We could take photos from screen when we do testing or I could buy a cheap pc-oscilloscope. We did measure spark current by using 0.5 ohm resistor in ground side and voltage over the resisitor will give amount of current (1 A= 0.5 V). |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 October 2009 at 7:40am |
|
|
LOL. Yea, that post.
When you looked at the signals did you write down what you measured? I would be interested in the data, even if it's in text format. I'll stay off the soap box when it comes to buying test equipment. Most of my equipment was rescued from the junk pile. My room looks like something out of a bad 70's science fiction movie. |
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 5:54am |
|
|
Picture of the system:
![]() Power supply is 300 W 12 V CD to 230 AC power supply which is modified to be 12 V DC to 320 V DC power supply (be careful if you try to do this. Continuous 320 V DC could kill easily ). Some measurement notes: -Without booster and MSD dis-2 + nology hotwires (around 33 pF capasitor inside plugwire and 460 ohm resistance)+ 0.6 ohm nology coil (primary inductance 1.65 mH, secondary resistance 8.7 kohm and secondary inductance 9.2 H. Coil second output was connected to ground) spark duration was 50 us. -nology wire will give short duration current spike. After 10 us current was 4 A, after 20 us 2 A and 40 us 1 A. -With booster and 40 A of current plasma threshold voltage was 40 V at 0.043" cap, 55 V at 0.12" cap and 65 V at 0.31" cap. -Around 2 A of current from power supply was enough to keep plasma alive forever at 0.043" cap. So, some control system was needed. -with 20 uF capasitor, 240 V voltage and 5 ohm output resistor current did drop from 40 A to 20 A at 100 us. I need to do more precise measurements at next time. |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 12:19pm |
|
|
The picture of your setup helped me understand.
I read your previous posts again. Looks like the bench setup is similar to what you described. A few minor differences, like the 4 parallel resistors in the picture rather than the 3 you described. Current sense resistor is not shown. Modified power supply is really just the supply with rectifier and filter cap. So your just using the AC peak, or 1.414 X 230 AC - drop of rectifier gives you your 320V. Looks like you then limit the current with another set of resistors before going into the IGBT.
Why make the IGBT drive the big filter cap? Maybe it's not. Hard to tell. Appears all open loop at this time (so no current control). What's the plan for the one you will use with the engine tests? Stay with open loop?
Did you take any pictures of the setup when you measured the current? I would like to see this as well if you don't mind.
Cool project BTW!
|
||
![]() |
||
PM720
Senior Member
Joined: 18 November 2003 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1776 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 1:26pm |
|
|
HEY! That looks like the way a lot of the race bikes I have seen are wired!
Scott
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 3:17pm |
|
Very good It was 3 ohm - 5 ohm resistor is suitable for output. With 5 ohm resistor peak output current is around 50 A and with 3 ohm peak current is around 100 A. There are four 20 ohm and 50 W resistors connected to pareller to get 5 ohm. 15 kV, 550 mA continuous and 50 A peak current microwave diodes (NTE517) will give a limit for maximum current. Four diodes in series will give 60 kV protection for system. I will probably use 8 diodes (2x4 diodes in pareller) for each plug and there are 8 plugs in the Vortex II head. Diodes cost $8 each and for final version $500 goes to diodes Between power supply and capasitors (2x20 uF capasitors connected to series = 10 uF) there is 50 ohm resistance (2x100 ohm pareller) to reduce current peaks from power supply.
What do you mean for open loop? Those big capasitors are polypropylene output capasitors (max peak current 700 A) because 50-100 A peak current is too much for power supply. Those aren't filter capasitors. IGBT is in the capasitor ground side and whole high voltage side of the power supply is off from the battery gound until current will flow in coil primary side. Between cdi-box coil output and igbt there is optocoupler for safety. My friend is pro-electrical engineer and he will probably going to re-design IGBT-control part of the circuit for final version (or whole thing ). Edited by shmot - 15 October 2009 at 3:46pm |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 6:04pm |
|
I started to sketch it out but am not clear on this sentance " IGBT is in the capasitor ground side and whole high voltage side of the power supply is off from the battery gound until current will flow in coil primary side. "
Could you maybe reword it.
Is the output from the DC-DC converter's ground tied to it's input ground and battery ground? These grounds all go to the output coil's one output that you have grounded through the current sense?
The IGBT the goes to this same ground as well?
You turn on the IGBT to charge the capacitors, then as the high voltage decays to the point where the diode bank is forward biased, the capacitors supply the energy? Then you turn off the IGBT to stop the cycle as DC-DC w/ 50 can't sustain arc? Or do you have control of DC-DC. Once cycle is done, you turn IGBT back on to recharge?
Just not 100% clear yet but getting closer.
Open loop meaning there is no feedback control system. You get what you get.
|
||
![]() |
||
shmot
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Finland Online Status: Offline Posts: 152 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 October 2009 at 4:01am |
|
|
Now we could talk:
![]() One thing what is needed to know is coil polarization. This circuit will work only with positive spark voltage. In twin output coil one is positive and other is negative. I am going to use one coil to each plug and sequential ignition. Two of these MSD boxes (4 output together) are needed to create sequential igition and two coils of each cylinder connected to parallel at primary side (cdi-output). That would give 50 000 V from each coil and sequential ignition will split in half of the current needed from the battery (otherwise it would be 80 A ). Edited by shmot - 16 October 2009 at 6:22am |
||
![]() |
||
geek
Senior Member
Joined: 08 January 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1943 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 October 2009 at 10:48am |
|
|
Ok, I think I am missing some more little details. I understand the idea but the drawing appears incorrect. The opto's output will never be lower than the IGBT's collector. Does the opto's ground, the zener and the 0.47 really go to the collector, or to the emitter of IGBT? If this is right, there would still be no return for 320V supply, so there would have to be another resistor to supply some current to charge the 15V gate drive. I changed your drawing to help explain.
Bigger picture, I am curious what you think the gains of this system will be. So what do you think the over all effect will be on the engine?
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 10> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |